| Principle |
Rating |
Explanation |
| Open-Ended Instruction
Lessons are structured so that multiple/complex answers are possible; students are not steered toward one 'right' answer.
| Very Good | Students are greatly encouraged to use their own ideas, creativity, opinions and observations throughout this resource - with the complexity of the issues a constant reminder that there is no one "right" answer! |
|---|
| Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Learning Multidisciplinary= addresses a number of different subjects
Interdisciplinary= integrated approach that blurs subject lines
Good: The resource provides opportunities for learning in a number of traditional 'subject' areas (eg. Language Arts, Science, Math, Art, etc.).
Very Good: The resource takes an integrated approach to teaching that blurs the lines between subject boundaries. | Very Good |
- This is a great resource for integrating many different subjects and learning situations.
- This resource could be more dynamic if a greater number of community people were brought in as part of the lesson discussions, and action plans.
- The interdisciplinary aspect of a project such as this is not just about the Social Studies and Math, but about the community.
- As is, however, there is an over-all "lived" approach to the environmental issues-looking at the whole problem, and not just from a single discipline.
|
|---|
| Discovery Learning Learning activities are
constructed so that students discover and build knowledge
for themselves and develop largely on their own
an understanding of concepts, principles and relationships.
They often do this by wrestling with questions, and/or solving problems
by exploring their environment, and/or
physically manipulating objects and/or performing experiments.
- Mediocre = Students are provided with intriguing questions, materials to use &
some direction on how to find answers. The learning involves unique experience & provides
some opportunity for an 'ah-hah' event
- Good =
Students are provided with intriguing questions, materials to use, &
make their own decisions on how to find answers. The learning involves unique experience & provides
definite opportunity for an 'ah-hah' event.
- Very Good =
Students choose what questions to investigate as well as the materials/strategies
to use to answer them.
| Very Good |
- Students are given tasks that encourage a problem-solving approach.
- Reaching consensus and building on prior knowledge is critical.
- Students explore their own environment and make their own observations. They collect data, analyse their findings and find a way to best represent their information.
|
|---|
Values Clarification Students are explicitly provided with opportunities to identify, clarify and express their own beliefs/values.
- Poor = Students are not explicitly given an opportunity to clarify their own values.
- Mediocre = Students are given a formal opportunity to clarify their own values. The range of perspectives in the resource is limited, therefore, students do not have an appropriate amount of information to clarify their own values.
| Very Good |
- The first lessons build to a finale with the last three activities leading to the students providing the issues for discussion and community education.
- Students are given several opportunities to assess and discuss their own perspectives about water issues and to consider what they value and why.
|
|---|
| Differentiated Instruction Activities address a range of learning styles/different intelligences. They teach to both cognitive and affective domains. Accommodations are suggested for people with learning difficulties. | Very Good |
- Several learning styles are facilitated in the lessons. Suggestions are made for various levels of learning, partly due to the fact that the resource was created for multiple grade use.
- There is tremendous potential for students who have worked through this series of activities to become mentors to younger students or even community groups.
- There is also potential here for this to be an excellent school-wide initiative.
|
|---|
Experiential Learning Direct, authentic experiences are used.
- Mediocre = simulation
- Good = authentic experience
- Very Good = authentic experience related to the primary goal of the lesson
| Very Good |
- Students are very much connected to their local environment.
- The clean-up day is an authentic experience.
- The series of lessons prepares children for roles as change agents.
|
|---|
Cooperative Learning Group and cooperative learning strategies are a priority.
- Mediocre = students work in groups
- Good = cooperative learning skills are explicitly taught and practiced
- Very Good = cooperative learning skills are explicitly taught, practiced and assessed
| Mediocre | |
|---|
| Assessment & Evaluation Tools are provided that help students and teachers to capture formative and summative information about students' learning and performance. These tools may include reflection questions, checklists, rubrics, etc. | Mediocre |
- Students are engaged in self and peer assessment as they exchange ideas and share attitudes and previous experiences.
- Teachers can glean much about their students' learning and knowledge if they circulate constantly from group to group. The teacher's role is that of an educational facilitator and the 'teacher as sage' dims.
- The perceived need and the follow-up actions must come from the children themselves in order that their involvement and solutions be authentic.
|
|---|
Peer Teaching Provides opportunities for students to actively present their knowledge and skills to peers and/or act as teachers and mentors.
- Mediocre = incidental teaching that arises from cooperative learning, presentations, etc.
- Good or Very Good = an opportunity is intentionally created to empower students to teach other students/community members. The audience is somehow reliant on the students' teaching (students are not simply ‘presenting')
| Very Good |
- There is tremendous potential for peer teaching and community involvement. Not one single Canadian, wherever we live in this country can afford to abstain from being a peer teacher on this topic.
- This resource provides a context of action and ideas for development into a national initiative of the most important kind.
|
|---|
| Case Studies Relevant case studies are used. Case studies are thorough descriptions of real events in real situations that can be used to examine concepts in an authentic context. | Mediocre |
- Teachers would need to get information about their own area- but other areas could be used as effective case studies.
- A forum for participants to share nationally their findings and their subsequent actions for change could be included.
- Teachers and students should check out the national website on this activity and submit their own stories and action plan results.
- Case studies could become the thread that defines what the problem is, how it has materialized, and most importantly, how communities have made effective and lasting positive change to sustain the integrity of our watersheds, waterways, and quality of water. This is a critical teaching/learning component.
|
|---|
| Locus of Control Meaningful opportunities are provided for students to choose elements of program content, the medium in which they wish to work, and/or to go deeper into a chosen issue. | Very Good |
- The resource starts a phenomenally important investigation and the participants should really be held accountable for taking this as far as it can go.
- Developers, participant observers, and participants are thrown into the role of "caretakers of wonder" and as such, have a responsibility to make what they do, authentic.
|